Deuteronomy 22:21 they shall reveal the damsel on the home of the woman father’s residence
Judges 19:2 along with his concubine starred the whore against your, and moved from your unto their dad’s household to Bethlehemjudah, and is here four whole period.
Jeremiah 3:12-14,22 Go and proclaim these terms toward the north, and say, Get Back, thou backsliding Israel, saith the father; and that I won’t create mine rage to fall upon your: for I am merciful, saith the father, and that I will not keep fury for evera€¦
Jeremiah 4:1,14 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith the LORD, return unto me personally: and in case thou wilt set aside thine abominations out of my personal picture, subsequently shalt thou perhaps not removea€¦
They say. –Better, as they say, as launching another application of the figure. The direct guide will be Deuteronomy 24:4, which forbade the come back to the past husband as an abomination, a laws that your latest advancement on the guide with the rules (2Kings 22:10-11) have most likely produced into prominence. But there is in addition a clear allusion towards similar imagery in Hosea. There the prophet had accomplished, actually or even in parable, what the law have prohibited (Hosea 2:16; Hosea 3:3), and therefore had held from the chance for return and also the desire of pardon. Jeremiah has to bring a sterner role. and to improve apostate adulteress at the very least believe that she had sinned as well deeply to own any claims to forgiveness. It may seems just as if Jehovah would never today return to the love of their espousals, and work out this lady what she when have been.
But get back again in my opinion, saith god. –The words noise during the English like a grateful invitation, and–in spite in the authority of several interpreters taking it an indignant exclamation, and go back to me personally! an invite offered in paradox, therefore equal to getting rejected, like that return had been out from the question–it must, i believe, be therefore used. The prophet have, even as we have seen, the historical past of Hosea in his mind’s eye, in which there was basically these a call to return (Hosea 2:19; Hosea 3:3), as well as refers to they and repeats they in Jeremiah 3:7; Jeremiah 3:12; Jeremiah 3:14. It surely means a want of insight into the type of Jeremiah to guess that he ever before came before males as announcing an irrevocable condemnation, leaving out the possibility of repentance.
Verse 1. – They say , etc.; as the margin of Authorized adaptation precisely mentions, the Hebrew merely has actually “saying.” Different ingenious efforts were made to describe this. Hitzig, for-instance, followed closely by Dr. Payne Smith, believes that “saying” are a unique equal for “that is to say,” “for example,” or perhaps the want; whilst the Vulgate and Rashi, with De Wette and RosenmA?ller, believe an ellipsis, and make, “it really is frequently stated,” or “I might state.” But much one particular organic method is to suppose that “stating” try a fragment of the superscription regarding the prophecy, the remainder that might accidentally placed in ver. 6, and this we should look over, “And the word-of the Lord came unto me when you look at the days of Josiah the master, stating.” Thus J. D. Michaelis, Ewald, Graf, Naegelsbach. If one set aside their spouse . The discussion are based on the legislation of Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which forbade an Israelite who had divorced their spouse to capture the woman once again, if when you look at the interval she was in fact married to a different. The Jews have broken a still most sacred tie, maybe not once just, but over and over; they worshipped “gods lots of and lords lots of;” so that they had no lengthier any declare on Jehovah in virtue of their “covenant” along with his men. Shall he return , etc.? rather, Ought he to go back? The power associated with the name are possible (compensation. Authorized Version of Genesis 34:7, “which thing ought to not ever performed”). Shall not in the next condition is rather wouldn’t normally . Yet return once again in my opinion. Very Peshito, Targum, Vulgate, therefore the see could seem is affirmed of the invitations in vers. 12, 14, 22. But as it’s clearly inconsistent making use of argument regarding the verse, and also as the verb may similarly very well be the infinitive or perhaps the crucial, latest commentators render, “And thinkest thou to come back in my opinion?” (practically, and returning to myself! implying that the really idea is actually inconceivable). Probably Jeremiah was actually aware most of the Jews are disappointed aided by the spiritual problem of country (comp. ver. 4).